What Reddit Is Actually Good For

This week two things landed in my inbox that point the same way. One was a piece arguing that the reason to be on Reddit isn't to get cited by AI answer engines. It's to listen. The other was a research project that read 137,000 posts on r/ChatGPT to track how people's relationship with the tool changed over time. Different subjects, same lesson. We spend a lot of energy deciding what to post into these platforms. The more interesting question this week was what to take out of them.

The Reddit argument, from a writer at Vermilion Cliffs, is that people go there to compare tools and read real experiences before they buy, so the useful move is to treat it as earned media. Join the conversations already happening, skip the pitch, and expect to spend around three months building credibility before you ask for anything. The line that stayed with me was about measurement. Reddit's influence rarely shows up in analytics, so you measure it by talking to your customers, not by watching a dashboard.

The second piece runs on the same idea at a larger scale. Researchers read 137,000 r/ChatGPT posts and watched discussion of therapy and companionship climb to roughly 10% of posts after GPT-4o was released in May 2024. Their monitoring could have flagged that shift by October 2024, months before the wider conversation about AI and emotional dependence got going. The public record held the signal. It just needed someone reading it.

There's a smaller example I liked even more. When Glastonbury tickets sold out in 42 minutes this year, the festival's subreddit did work the brand couldn't. Roughly one in six comments were people asking where their confirmation email was, and other ticket buyers answered them. The community handled reassurance and troubleshooting that no brand team was staffed to cover. The festival's contribution was giving people a place to gather, not scripting what they did there.

Underneath all of this is a shift in where judgment lives. One estimate going around puts most AI brand mentions as coming from third parties rather than your own site. I'd treat the exact number as directional, but the direction is right. What other people say about you in these spaces now matters more than what you publish about yourself. Reading it well is research, and research is the part the software still doesn't do for you. AI can summarize 137,000 posts in a minute. It can't tell you which question was worth asking, or sit across from someone and know when to follow up.

That last part is what I'm spending the fall on, sitting down with marketing practitioners around Vancouver to hear how they're actually using AI, rather than how the case studies say they are. I'll have more to say once I've done more of the listening.

Sources

Back to blog